![Hemosonics-Hero-mobile-blood-dials](https://hemosonics.com/wp-content/uploads/hemosonics-hero-mobile-blood-dials-450x240-1.jpg)
References
1. QPlus Cartridge Instructions for Use (IFU). HemoSonics, LLC. 2. QStat Cartridge Instructions for Use (IFU). HemoSonics, LLC. 3.Quantra® Hemostasis Analyzer User Manual. 2020. HemoSonics, LLC. 4. Baulig W, Akbas S, Schütt PK, et al. Comparison of the resonance sonorheometry based Quantra® system with rotational thromboelastometry ROTEM® sigma in cardiac surgery – a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):260. 5. Idowu O, Ifeanyi-Pillette I,Owusu-Agyemang P, et al. The quantra hemostasisanalyzer compared to thromboelastography (TEG) in the surgical oncologic population: a prospective observational trial. J Surg Oncol. 2021;124(5):894-905. 6. Michelson EA, Cripps MW, Ray B, Winegar DA, Viola F. Initial clinical experience with the Quantra QStat System in adult trauma patients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020;5(1):e000581. 7. Groves DS, Welsby IJ, Naik BI, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Quantra QPlus System in adult patients undergoing major surgical procedures. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(4):899-909. 8. Winegar DA, Viola F. Is the Quantra QPlus system easy to interpret? American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) Annual Scientific Meeting, Virtual Congress, December 13-17, 2020. 9. Winegar DA, Gillespie C, Sanchez-Illan M. Improving the interpretation of viscoelastic test results in the critical care setting. American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) Annual Scientific Meeting, July 24-28, 2022. 10. Leadbetter NH, Givens TB, Viola F. Unique approach to quality assurance in viscoelastic testing. J Appl Lab Med. 2020;5(6):1228-1241. 11. Ferrante EA, Blasier KR, Givens TB, Lloyd CA, Fischer TJ, Viola F. A novel device for the evaluation of hemostatic function in critical care settings. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1372-1379. 12. DeAnda A, Levy G, Kinsky M, et al. Comparison of the Quantra QPlus System with thromboelastography in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(4)1030-1036. 13. Naik BI, Durieux ME, Knisely A, et al. SEER sonorheometry versus rotational thromboelastometry in large volume blood loss spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1380-1389. 14. Huffmyer JL, Fernandez LG, Haghighian C, Terkawi AS, Groves DS. Comparison of SEER sonorheometry with rotational thromboelastometry and laboratory parameters in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1390-1399. 15. Reynolds PS, Middleton P, McCarthy H, Spiess BD. A comparison of a new ultrasound-based whole blood viscoelastic test (SEER sonorheometry) versus thromboelastography in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1400-1407. 16. Baryshnikova E, Di Dedda U, Ranucci M. A comparative study of SEER sonorheometry versus standard coagulation tests, rotational thromboelastometry, and multiple electrode aggregometry in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 ;33(6):1590-1598. 17. Quantra System IT and Networking Guide. HemoSonics, LLC. 18. Quantra Desktop Remote Viewer Instructions for Use (IFU). HemoSonics, LLC. 19. Ranucci M, Baryshnikova E. Sensitivity of viscoelastic tests to platelet function. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(1):189.